Trinity Industries vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies
TRN and WAB side by side, both in transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TRN and WAB compare
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies is the larger company, worth 21 times as much as Trinity Industries ($47.2B against $2.3B).
On earnings, Trinity Industries is cheaper: it trades at 7.1× trailing earnings, against 37.6× for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus −2.4% for Trinity Industries).
Trinity Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.4% compared with 10.6% at Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.
Both pay dividends: Trinity Industries yields 4.4% and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies 0.42%.
Trinity Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 17 for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TRN | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.3B | $47.2B |
| Share price | $28.32 | $279.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.28% | 38.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.6% | 197% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 2,650 | 31K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.1× (better) | 37.6× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 3.9× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 4.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.0× (better) | 21.2× |
| P/FCF | 6.3× (better) | 27.6× |
| PEG | 0.11 (better) | 1.48 |
| FCF yield | 15.8% (better) | 3.6% |
| Fair value | $77.52 | $161.68 |
| Margin of safety | 63.5% (better) | −72.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.4% | 13.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | 8.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 242% (better) | 10.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 251% (better) | 11.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 25.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.6% | 35.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 34.5% (better) | 16.4% |
| Net margin | 15.4% (better) | 10.6% |
| FCF margin | 16.8% (better) | 14.3% |
| Return on equity | 30.7% (better) | 11.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 63.1% (better) | 9.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.59 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.35 |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.9× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.12 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.92 | 3.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.4% (better) | 0.42% |
| Payout ratio | 30.5% | 15.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.2% | 15.8% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.4% (better) | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% (better) | 1.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.9% | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$502K (better) | −$41.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- TRN stock overview
- TRN income statement
- TRN valuation and score
- WAB stock overview
- WAB income statement
- WAB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.