Tapestry vs Vera Bradley
TPR and VRA side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TPR and VRA compare
Tapestry is the larger company, worth 122 times as much as Vera Bradley ($23.2B against $189M).
Tapestry grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.2% versus −1.7% for Vera Bradley).
Tapestry keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.1% compared with −3.7% at Vera Bradley.
Tapestry pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Vera Bradley does not pay one.
Tapestry scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 9 for Vera Bradley), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TPR | VRA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.2B | $189M |
| Share price | $116.29 | $6.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.0% | 169% |
| Change, 5 years | 174% | −37.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.13 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 21K | 1,360 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.0× | – |
| P/S | 2.9× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 33.5× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 12.8× | 6.5× (better) |
| PEG | 0.69 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.8% | 15.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $95.67 | $6.14 |
| Margin of safety | −21.5% | −7.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.2% (better) | −1.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.9% (better) | −10.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 734% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 787% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 19.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 77.8% (better) | 50.4% |
| Operating margin | 23.9% (better) | −3.6% |
| Net margin | 19.1% (better) | −3.7% |
| FCF margin | 22.6% (better) | 10.7% |
| Return on equity | 197% (better) | −7.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 76.9% (better) | −7.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.46 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.60 | – |
| Interest coverage | 16.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.75 | 2.44 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.01 (better) | 3.45 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 21.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.7% | 37.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.66% | 39.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$48.4M | $909K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.9% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- TPR stock overview
- TPR income statement
- TPR valuation and score
- VRA stock overview
- VRA income statement
- VRA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.