Travel & Leisure vs Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
TNL and WH side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TNL and WH compare
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Travel & Leisure ($5.8B against $4.7B).
On earnings, Travel & Leisure is cheaper: it trades at 20.9× trailing earnings, against 29.4× for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts.
Travel & Leisure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.6% versus 0.70% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts).
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.0% compared with 5.7% at Travel & Leisure.
Both pay dividends: Travel & Leisure yields 3.0% and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts 2.1%.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Travel & Leisure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TNL | WH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $5.8B |
| Share price | $78.65 | $79.32 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.6% | 8.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 42.7% | −9.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 45 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.9× (better) | 29.4× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/B | – | 12.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.6× (better) | 17.4× |
| P/FCF | 11.4× (better) | 17.5× |
| FCF yield | 8.8% (better) | 5.7% |
| Fair value | $70.50 | $55.00 |
| Margin of safety | −11.6% (better) | −44.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.6% (better) | 0.70% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.2% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −42.8% | −40.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −38.0% | −37.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 92.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 13.0% | 29.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.7% | 14.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.0% | 22.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 38.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 9.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 5.74 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.48 |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | 3.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | – | 1.01 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.65 | 1.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.0% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | 63.4% | 63.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 24.0% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 6.8% (better) | 4.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.8% (better) | 6.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 2.4% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$28.6M | −$15.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.1% | 11.2% |
Go deeper
- TNL stock overview
- TNL income statement
- TNL valuation and score
- WH stock overview
- WH income statement
- WH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.