Tandy Leather Factory vs Vera Bradley
TLF and VRA side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TLF and VRA compare
Vera Bradley is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Tandy Leather Factory ($189M against $18.0M).
Tandy Leather Factory grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.4% versus −1.7% for Vera Bradley).
Tandy Leather Factory keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.1% compared with −3.7% at Vera Bradley.
Tandy Leather Factory pays a dividend yielding 34.1%; Vera Bradley does not pay one.
Tandy Leather Factory scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Vera Bradley), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TLF | VRA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $18.0M | $189M |
| Share price | $2.20 | $6.60 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.7% | 169% |
| Change, 5 years | −58.5% | −37.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 538 | 1,360 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 6.5× |
| FCF yield | −12.8% | 15.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $7.13 | $6.14 |
| Margin of safety | 69.1% (better) | −7.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.4% (better) | −1.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.6% (better) | −10.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −115% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −116% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 59.5% (better) | 50.4% |
| Operating margin | −0.49% (better) | −3.6% |
| Net margin | −2.1% (better) | −3.7% |
| FCF margin | −3.0% | 10.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −3.2% (better) | −7.4% |
| Return on invested capital | −0.75% (better) | −7.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 4.55 (better) | 2.44 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.70 | 3.45 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 34.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 34.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.9% | 37.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.8% | 39.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $909K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.06% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- TLF stock overview
- TLF income statement
- TLF valuation and score
- VRA stock overview
- VRA income statement
- VRA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.