TIM vs Telus
TIMB and TU side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TIMB and TU compare
TIM grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.6% versus 0.59% for Telus).
TIM scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Telus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TIMB | TU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $17.68 | $8.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −23.8% | −39.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 51.9% | −61.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.38 | 0.37 |
| Employees | 8,706 | 32K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.6% (better) | 0.59% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.0% (better) | 5.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 36.9% (better) | 7.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.6% (better) | −5.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.9% | 88.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 23.8% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net margin | – | 5.4% |
| FCF margin | 33.4% (better) | 10.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 7.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 3.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 2.37 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.06 | 4.68 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.9× | 2.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.89 (better) | 0.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.88% | 44.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.05% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$303K | – |
Go deeper
- TIMB stock overview
- TIMB income statement
- TIMB valuation and score
- TU stock overview
- TU income statement
- TU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.