UP Fintech vs WisdomTree
TIGR and WT side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TIGR and WT compare
UP Fintech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.3% versus 45.2% for WisdomTree).
WisdomTree pays a dividend yielding 0.56%; UP Fintech does not pay one.
WisdomTree scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 3 for UP Fintech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TIGR | WT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.2B |
| Share price | $4.02 | $21.44 |
| Change, 1 year | −62.1% | 82.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −38.3% | 230% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.69 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 244 | 360 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.2× |
| P/S | – | 4.9× |
| P/B | – | 7.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 15.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.88 |
| FCF yield | – | 6.4% |
| Fair value | – | $17.25 |
| Margin of safety | – | −24.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 56.3% (better) | 45.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 34.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 14.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 158% (better) | 9.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 44.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 39.9% |
| Net margin | – | 16.6% |
| FCF margin | 214% (better) | 31.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 27.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 161% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 5.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.12 | 3.54 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.02 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.56% |
| Payout ratio | – | 15.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.1% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 19.1% | 9.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$42.9K (better) | −$4.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- TIGR stock overview
- TIGR income statement
- TIGR valuation and score
- WT stock overview
- WT income statement
- WT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.