TIC Solutions vs UL Solutions
TIC and ULS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TIC and ULS compare
UL Solutions is the larger company, worth 6.9 times as much as TIC Solutions ($15.1B against $2.2B).
UL Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.1% compared with −5.6% at TIC Solutions.
Both pay dividends: TIC Solutions yields 102% and UL Solutions 0.76%.
UL Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for TIC Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TIC | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $15.1B |
| Share price | $10.05 | $74.76 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.3% | −7.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.40 | 0.47 |
| Employees | – | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.1× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 4.8× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 9.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.6× (better) | 19.9× |
| P/FCF | 98.7× | 34.6× (better) |
| PEG | – | 10.52 |
| FCF yield | 1.0% | 2.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $11.54 | $62.88 |
| Margin of safety | 12.9% (better) | −18.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 6.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 54.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 53.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.9% | 50.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.2% | 17.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.6% | 16.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.1% | 13.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −7.1% | 37.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −1.4% | 28.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 | 0.19 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.40 (better) | −0.18 |
| Interest coverage | – | 17.6× |
| Current ratio | 2.91 (better) | 1.42 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.15 | 8.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 102% (better) | 0.76% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 102% (better) | 0.76% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.7% | 43.3% |
| Held by insiders | 51.3% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$503K (better) | −$1.1B |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
Go deeper
- TIC stock overview
- TIC income statement
- TIC valuation and score
- ULS stock overview
- ULS income statement
- ULS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.