Gentherm vs Visteon
THRM and VC side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How THRM and VC compare
Visteon is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Gentherm ($2.0B against $1.6B).
Gentherm grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.8% versus 1.9% for Visteon).
Both pay dividends: Gentherm yields 7.0% and Visteon 1.7%.
Visteon scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for Gentherm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | THRM | VC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Share price | $29.58 | $80.07 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.5% | −25.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −65.4% | −33.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 116 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.8× |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.4× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 77.2× | – |
| PEG | – | 0.74 |
| FCF yield | 1.3% | – |
| Fair value | $20.52 | $115.26 |
| Margin of safety | −44.1% | 30.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% (better) | 1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.4% (better) | 8.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −36.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −36.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −20.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.7% (better) | 10.4% |
| Operating margin | 3.4% | – |
| Net margin | – | 4.1% |
| FCF margin | 1.3% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 10.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.44 | 0.23 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.61 (better) | −0.41 |
| Current ratio | 2.05 (better) | 1.61 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.26 (better) | 3.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.0% (better) | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 14.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.0% | 16.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.0% | 129% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $420K (better) | −$11.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | 16.8% |
Go deeper
- THRM stock overview
- THRM income statement
- THRM valuation and score
- VC stock overview
- VC income statement
- VC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.