Teck Resources vs Vulcan Materials
TECK and VMC side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TECK and VMC compare
Teck Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.7% versus 1.6% for Vulcan Materials).
Vulcan Materials keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.8% compared with 13.0% at Teck Resources.
Vulcan Materials pays a dividend yielding 0.73%; Teck Resources does not pay one.
Vulcan Materials scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Teck Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TECK | VMC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $36.4B |
| Share price | $60.61 | $281.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.9% | −4.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 124% | 43.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 0.82 |
| Employees | – | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 33.3× |
| P/S | – | 4.6× |
| P/B | – | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 46.7× |
| PEG | – | 1.42 |
| FCF yield | – | 2.1% |
| Fair value | – | $214.77 |
| Margin of safety | – | −31.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.7% (better) | 1.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 10.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 245% (better) | −1.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 263% (better) | 0.36% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.7% | 27.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 20.9% (better) | 20.3% |
| Net margin | 13.0% | 13.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.3% | 9.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.5% | 12.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | 9.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.16 (better) | 0.56 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.28 | 1.96 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 7.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.54 (better) | 1.43 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.95 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.73% |
| Payout ratio | – | 24.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.2% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 3.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.1% | 98.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.21% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$15.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- TECK stock overview
- TECK income statement
- TECK valuation and score
- VMC stock overview
- VMC income statement
- VMC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.