StockData

Tidewater vs Viking

TDW and VIK side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How TDW and VIK compare

Viking grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.0% versus −1.0% for Tidewater).

Viking keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.3% compared with 18.3% at Tidewater.

Tidewater scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Viking), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricTDWVIK
Size and price
Market cap$4.3B–
Share price$87.33$87.47
Change, 1 year76.8%46.9%
Change, 5 years599%–
Beta (5Y)0.851.23
Employees7,30013K
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)6
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E17.7×–
P/S3.2×–
P/B3.1×–
EV/EBITDA9.6×–
P/FCF16.0×–
FCF yield6.2%–
Fair value$78.21–
Margin of safety−11.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.0%20.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average27.8%–
Net income growth (TTM)24.1%64.8% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)27.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin–43.2%
Operating margin18.4%23.3% (better)
Net margin18.3%19.3% (better)
FCF margin20.1%–
Return on equity19.5%–
Return on invested capital17.5%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.47–
Net debt / EBITDA0.09 (better)1.01
Interest coverage–4.6×
Current ratio3.58 (better)0.81
Altman Z-score3.77–
Piotroski F-score78 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions115%47.7%
Held by insiders7.0%53.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$10.5M (better)−$39.6M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float–4.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.