StockData

Tucows vs trivago

TCX and TRVG side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How TCX and TRVG compare

trivago grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.1% versus 2.9% for Tucows).

trivago keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.0% compared with −17.9% at Tucows.

trivago scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 2 for Tucows), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricTCXTRVG
Size and price
Market cap$131M–
Share price$11.73$4.15
Change, 1 year−45.1%29.7%
Change, 5 years−86.7%−65.8%
Beta (5Y)1.120.74
Employees759893
StockData Score
Total score29 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score03 (better)
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.3×–
FCF yield−16.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.9%19.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.6%17.1% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin26.1%97.3% (better)
Operating margin−4.7%0.28% (better)
Net margin−17.9%2.0% (better)
FCF margin−5.5%–
Return on equity–5.5%
Return on invested capital−19.2%2.3% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−0.3×37.3× (better)
Current ratio0.502.22 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.29–
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions56.8%2.0%
Held by insiders19.2%14.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$281K
Short interest, % of float10.6%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.