TransAct Technologies vs Wetouch Technology
TACT and WETH side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TACT and WETH compare
TransAct Technologies is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Wetouch Technology ($50.9M against $11.5M).
Wetouch Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.3% versus 10.5% for TransAct Technologies).
Wetouch Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.6% compared with −0.75% at TransAct Technologies.
Wetouch Technology pays a dividend yielding 4.7%; TransAct Technologies does not pay one.
Wetouch Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 10 for TransAct Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TACT | WETH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $50.9M | $11.5M |
| Share price | $4.93 | $0.860 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.1% | −66.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.0% | −85.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.49 |
| Employees | 103 | 152 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 1.2× |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 158× (better) | −10.4× |
| P/FCF | 9.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.3% | – |
| Fair value | $3.85 | $16.24 |
| Margin of safety | −28.1% | 94.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.5% | 11.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.0% (better) | 7.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 10.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 11.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −37.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.6% (better) | 32.1% |
| Operating margin | −0.80% | 23.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.75% | 17.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.9% | – |
| Return on equity | −1.3% | 6.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2.5% | 38.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.65 | 35.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.38 | 4.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 38.0% | 6.0% |
| Held by insiders | 62.0% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $351K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.70% | 0.11% |
Go deeper
- TACT stock overview
- TACT income statement
- TACT valuation and score
- WETH stock overview
- WETH income statement
- WETH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.