Symbotic vs Zebra Technologies
SYM and ZBRA side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SYM and ZBRA compare
Symbotic is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Zebra Technologies ($22.9B against $17.1B).
On earnings, Zebra Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 33.1× trailing earnings, against 759× for Symbotic.
Symbotic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 12.7% for Zebra Technologies).
Zebra Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with 0.31% at Symbotic.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SYM | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.9B | $17.1B |
| Share price | $37.93 | $361.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −51.2% | 33.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 277% | −40.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 1.63 |
| Employees | 2,000 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 759× | 33.1× (better) |
| P/S | 8.7× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 32.4× | 5.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 559× | 18.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 18.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 5.3% |
| Fair value | $6.12 | $344.42 |
| Margin of safety | −520% | −4.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.6% (better) | 12.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 89.4% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −1.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 3.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −2.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.3% | 49.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.01% | 14.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.31% | 9.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 15.5% |
| Return on equity | 1.8% | 15.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 11.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.81 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.44 |
| Current ratio | 1.33 (better) | 0.52 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.23 (better) | 3.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −1.8% | 5.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −1.8% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 19.2% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 85.8% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$963M | −$2.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.6% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- SYM stock overview
- SYM income statement
- SYM valuation and score
- ZBRA stock overview
- ZBRA income statement
- ZBRA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.