Standex International vs Tennant
SXI and TNC side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SXI and TNC compare
Standex International is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Tennant ($3.0B against $1.3B).
On earnings, Standex International is cheaper: it trades at 26.2× trailing earnings, against 75.5× for Tennant.
Standex International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus −2.9% for Tennant).
Standex International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.5% compared with 1.5% at Tennant.
Both pay dividends: Standex International yields 0.42% and Tennant 1.6%.
Standex International scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Tennant), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SXI | TNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $245.63 | $76.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.2% | 3.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 116% | −7.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 4,100 | 4,484 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.2× (better) | 75.5× |
| P/S | 3.3× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.8× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.9× (better) | 40.7× |
| P/FCF | 47.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 2.1% (better) | −0.21% |
| Fair value | $250.30 | $34.25 |
| Margin of safety | 1.9% (better) | −123% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.3% (better) | −2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 116% (better) | −69.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 115% (better) | −68.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.9% (better) | 5.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.4% (better) | 38.8% |
| Operating margin | 22.5% (better) | 3.2% |
| Net margin | 12.5% (better) | 1.5% |
| FCF margin | 6.9% (better) | −0.22% |
| Return on equity | 15.3% (better) | 3.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.8% (better) | 3.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 (better) | 0.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.65 (better) | 7.25 |
| Interest coverage | 7.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.19 (better) | 2.04 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.77 (better) | 3.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 14.4% | 119% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.3% (better) | 6.1% |
| Buyback yield | 0.17% | 9.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.58% | 10.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 1.8% | 6.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.6M | $882K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 8.4% |
Go deeper
- SXI stock overview
- SXI income statement
- SXI valuation and score
- TNC stock overview
- TNC income statement
- TNC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.