SunCoke Energy vs Titan International
SXC and TWI side by side, both in steel works, blast furnaces, and rolling and finishing mills. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SXC and TWI compare
SunCoke Energy is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Titan International ($895M against $329M).
Titan International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.1% versus 2.9% for SunCoke Energy).
SunCoke Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.9% compared with −5.7% at Titan International.
SunCoke Energy pays a dividend yielding 4.6%; Titan International does not pay one.
SunCoke Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Titan International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SXC | TWI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $895M | $329M |
| Share price | $10.54 | $5.10 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.0% | −34.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 71.4% | −33.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 2,477 | 8,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1× (better) | 9.9× |
| P/FCF | 7.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 13.3% (better) | −8.2% |
| Fair value | $9.89 | $6.93 |
| Margin of safety | −6.6% | 26.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.9% | 22.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | 7.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −185% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −186% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 13.8% |
| Operating margin | −1.3% | 0.29% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.9% (better) | −5.7% |
| FCF margin | 6.3% (better) | −1.3% |
| Return on equity | −8.5% (better) | −22.9% |
| Return on invested capital | −1.5% | 0.53% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.00 (better) | 1.24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.35 (better) | 5.32 |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | 0.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.03 | 2.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.74 | 1.90 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.0% | 87.5% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 30.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $159K (better) | −$54.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- SXC stock overview
- SXC income statement
- SXC valuation and score
- TWI stock overview
- TWI income statement
- TWI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.