Silvercorp Metals vs Trekor Metals
SVM and TGB side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SVM and TGB compare
Silvercorp Metals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.6% versus 10.7% for Trekor Metals).
Silvercorp Metals scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Trekor Metals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SVM | TGB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $9.22 | $7.21 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.6% | 56.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 115% | 262% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.58 |
| Employees | – | 311 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 46.6% (better) | 10.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.9% (better) | 14.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −117% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −118% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.9% (better) | 22.0% |
| Operating margin | 18.7% (better) | 3.0% |
| Net margin | −2.3% | – |
| FCF margin | 67.9% | – |
| Return on equity | −1.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.54 |
| Interest coverage | 6.1× (better) | 0.5× |
| Current ratio | 3.58 (better) | 1.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 54.7% | 48.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.2% | – |
Go deeper
- SVM stock overview
- SVM income statement
- SVM valuation and score
- TGB stock overview
- TGB income statement
- TGB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.