Strategic Education vs Universal Technical Institute
STRA and UTI side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How STRA and UTI compare
Strategic Education and Universal Technical Institute are about the same size, with market caps of $1.2B and $1.3B.
On earnings, Universal Technical Institute is cheaper: it trades at 37.1× trailing earnings, against 319× for Strategic Education.
Universal Technical Institute grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.1% versus 2.8% for Strategic Education).
Universal Technical Institute keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.9% compared with 0.74% at Strategic Education.
Strategic Education pays a dividend yielding 4.4%; Universal Technical Institute does not pay one.
Strategic Education scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 10 for Universal Technical Institute), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | STRA | UTI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $54.30 | $23.00 |
| Change, 1 year | −30.8% | −22.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.8% | 171% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 3,683 | 4,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 319× | 37.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.5× (better) | 15.5× |
| P/FCF | 7.4× | – |
| PEG | 7.84 | 0.85 (better) |
| FCF yield | 13.6% (better) | −1.8% |
| Fair value | $66.50 | $14.17 |
| Margin of safety | 18.4% (better) | −62.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% | 9.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | 22.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −91.6% | −45.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −96.5% | −45.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.5% | 86.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 4.3% | 5.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.74% | 3.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 12.7% (better) | −2.6% |
| Return on equity | 0.60% | 10.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.9% | 10.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.46 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.12 |
| Interest coverage | – | 11.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.08 | 1.30 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.50 | 2.78 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 567% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 12.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 16.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.2% | 113% |
| Held by insiders | 3.9% | 35.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.9M (better) | −$104M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 21.7% |
Go deeper
- STRA stock overview
- STRA income statement
- STRA valuation and score
- UTI stock overview
- UTI income statement
- UTI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.