StockData

Starling Oncology vs Teladoc Health

STLN and TDOC side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How STLN and TDOC compare

Teladoc Health is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Starling Oncology ($1.5B against $666M).

Starling Oncology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.4% versus −2.4% for Teladoc Health).

Starling Oncology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.2% compared with −6.3% at Teladoc Health.

Starling Oncology scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Teladoc Health), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSTLNTDOC
Size and price
Market cap$666M$1.5B
Share price$6.53$8.51
Change, 1 year38.9%3.4%
Change, 5 years−34.6%−94.2%
Beta (5Y)1.602.06
Employees6415,600
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)4
Valuation score13 (better)
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score1 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.1×0.6× (better)
P/B–1.2×
P/FCF–5.9×
FCF yield−0.49%16.9% (better)
Fair value–$13.77
Margin of safety–38.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)38.4% (better)−2.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average21.8% (better)18.3%
Profitability
Gross margin–68.6%
Operating margin−4.4% (better)−6.6%
Net margin−6.2% (better)−6.3%
FCF margin−0.56%10.6% (better)
Return on equity–−11.5%
Return on invested capital−83.1%−23.2% (better)
Financial health
Interest coverage−3.4× (better)−8.0×
Current ratio1.36 (better)0.87
Altman Z-score2.78 (better)−7.11
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions43.4%83.9%
Held by insiders56.6%0.72%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$122K (better)−$2.3M
Short interest, % of float–16.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.