E.W. Scripps vs Versant Media
SSP and VSNT side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SSP and VSNT compare
Versant Media is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as E.W. Scripps ($5.0B against $335M).
Versant Media grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.3% versus −8.9% for E.W. Scripps).
Versant Media keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.9% compared with −54.2% at E.W. Scripps.
Versant Media pays a dividend yielding 3.1%; E.W. Scripps does not pay one.
Versant Media scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for E.W. Scripps), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SSP | VSNT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $335M | $5.0B |
| Share price | $3.61 | $35.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 17.6% | – |
| Change, 5 years | −82.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.78 | – |
| Employees | 4,600 | 4,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 2.3× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.2× |
| P/FCF | 2.3× (better) | 2.7× |
| FCF yield | 44.3% (better) | 37.1% |
| Fair value | $11.69 | $103.66 |
| Margin of safety | 69.1% (better) | 65.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.9% | −5.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5071% | −31.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.1% | 56.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −48.4% | 19.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −54.2% | 13.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.0% | 27.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −163% | 9.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −25.4% | 9.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 17.23 | 0.36 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.16 |
| Interest coverage | −4.6× | 97.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.41 | 2.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.88 | 1.72 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.9% | 87.9% |
| Held by insiders | 28.9% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $7.1M (better) | $6.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- SSP stock overview
- SSP income statement
- SSP valuation and score
- VSNT stock overview
- VSNT income statement
- VSNT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.