Stoneridge vs Visteon
SRI and VC side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SRI and VC compare
Visteon is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Stoneridge ($2.0B against $145M).
Stoneridge grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.8% versus 1.9% for Visteon).
Visteon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with −14.6% at Stoneridge.
Visteon pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Stoneridge does not pay one.
Visteon scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 4 for Stoneridge), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SRI | VC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $145M | $2.0B |
| Share price | $5.07 | $82.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.3% | −23.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −77.4% | −31.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 4,200 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.2× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.1× |
| PEG | – | 0.76 |
| FCF yield | −0.06% | – |
| Fair value | $12.32 | $112.07 |
| Margin of safety | 58.9% (better) | 26.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 37.8% (better) | 1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | 8.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −36.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −36.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.5% (better) | 10.4% |
| Operating margin | −6.9% | – |
| Net margin | −14.6% | 4.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.01% | – |
| Return on equity | −70.8% | 10.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −24.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.16 | 0.23 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.41 |
| Current ratio | 0.96 | 1.61 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.64 | 3.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 14.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 15.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.0% | 129% |
| Held by insiders | 12.9% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $85.7K (better) | −$11.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 16.8% |
Go deeper
- SRI stock overview
- SRI income statement
- SRI valuation and score
- VC stock overview
- VC income statement
- VC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.