Sportradar vs Tempus AI
SRAD and TEM side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SRAD and TEM compare
Tempus AI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.4% versus 16.6% for Sportradar).
Sportradar keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.8% compared with −17.8% at Tempus AI.
Sportradar scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Tempus AI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SRAD | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $12.9M |
| Share price | $12.03 | $72.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −54.0% | −18.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.3% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.44 | 2.93 |
| Employees | 5,090 | 3,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.0× |
| P/B | – | 0.0× |
| FCF yield | – | −2041% |
| Fair value | – | $11130.20 |
| Margin of safety | – | 99.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.6% | 50.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 26.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 194% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 85.2% | – |
| Operating margin | – | −19.8% |
| Net margin | 7.8% (better) | −17.8% |
| FCF margin | 30.9% (better) | −18.4% |
| Return on equity | 10.5% (better) | −67.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.06 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.11 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −5.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 3.30 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | −0.82 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 16.6% | 61.3% |
| Held by insiders | 9.9% | 38.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $11.3M (better) | −$191M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 22.6% |
Go deeper
- SRAD stock overview
- SRAD income statement
- SRAD valuation and score
- TEM stock overview
- TEM income statement
- TEM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.