StockData

Sportradar vs Teads

SRAD and TEAD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How SRAD and TEAD compare

Sportradar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.6% versus 12.3% for Teads).

Sportradar keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.8% compared with −43.3% at Teads.

Sportradar scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 2 for Teads), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSRADTEAD
Size and price
Market cap–$28.5M
Share price$12.03$0.291
Change, 1 year−54.0%−80.9%
Change, 5 years−45.3%−98.2%
Beta (5Y)1.441.42
Employees5,0901,700
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score4 (better)2
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score4 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.0×
P/B–3.9×
FCF yield–−160%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)16.6% (better)12.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average26.1% (better)11.1%
Net income growth (TTM)194%–
Profitability
Gross margin85.2% (better)33.2%
Operating margin–−31.9%
Net margin7.8% (better)−43.3%
FCF margin30.9% (better)−3.7%
Return on equity10.5% (better)−196%
Return on invested capital–−201%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.06 (better)0.96
Net debt / EBITDA−1.11–
Interest coverage–−5.6×
Current ratio1.17 (better)0.98
Altman Z-score–−0.97
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–0.72%
Shareholder yield–0.72%
Ownership
Held by institutions16.6%20.6%
Held by insiders9.9%63.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months$11.3M (better)$164K
Short interest, % of float–10.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.