SiriusPoint vs Stewart Information Services
SPNT and STC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SPNT and STC compare
SiriusPoint is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Stewart Information Services ($3.1B against $1.3B).
On earnings, SiriusPoint is cheaper: it trades at 6.7× trailing earnings, against 10.4× for Stewart Information Services.
Stewart Information Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.5% versus 18.1% for SiriusPoint).
SiriusPoint keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.9% compared with 3.6% at Stewart Information Services.
Stewart Information Services pays a dividend yielding 5.1%; SiriusPoint does not pay one.
Stewart Information Services scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for SiriusPoint), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SPNT | STC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $26.81 | $41.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.9% | −43.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 215% | −46.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 1,072 | 7,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.7× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 4.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 12.4× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.0% |
| Fair value | $31.37 | $67.95 |
| Margin of safety | 14.5% | 38.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.1% | 20.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 29.2% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 153% (better) | 18.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 147% (better) | 11.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.9% (better) | −8.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 14.9% (better) | 3.6% |
| FCF margin | – | 3.0% |
| Return on equity | 22.6% (better) | 7.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.61 | 2.00 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.1% |
| Payout ratio | 0.00% | 54.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.3% |
| Buyback yield | 3.2% (better) | 0.45% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% | 5.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.9% | 98.1% |
| Held by insiders | 60.9% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$171K |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.6% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- SPNT stock overview
- SPNT income statement
- SPNT valuation and score
- STC stock overview
- STC income statement
- STC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.