StockData

Safe Pro vs Wrap Technologies

SPAI and WRAP side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How SPAI and WRAP compare

Safe Pro and Wrap Technologies are about the same size, with market caps of $61.9M and $71.1M.

Safe Pro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (92.6% versus 87.3% for Wrap Technologies).

Wrap Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −223% compared with −500% at Safe Pro.

Wrap Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Safe Pro), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSPAIWRAP
Size and price
Market cap$61.9M$71.1M
Share price$3.04$1.27
Change, 1 year−41.9%−40.7%
Change, 5 years–−76.6%
Beta (5Y)3.341.90
Employees1525
StockData Score
Total score59 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score01 (better)
Health score36 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S21.5×11.7× (better)
P/B5.2× (better)5.3×
FCF yield−13.6%−12.7% (better)
Fair value$2.59$0.962
Margin of safety−17.5% (better)−32.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)92.6% (better)87.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–3.4%
Profitability
Gross margin62.2%63.6% (better)
Operating margin−514%−227% (better)
Net margin−500%−223% (better)
FCF margin−292%−150% (better)
Return on equity−198%−108% (better)
Return on invested capital−617%−134% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.01 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−1176.3×–
Current ratio8.76 (better)8.04
Altman Z-score17.83 (better)8.48
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions10.3%10.3%
Held by insiders28.4%57.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$4.0M−$344K (better)
Short interest, % of float4.3%32.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.