AsiaStrategy vs Top Wealth
SORA and TWG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SORA and TWG compare
Top Wealth grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (92.3% versus −37.7% for AsiaStrategy).
AsiaStrategy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 112% compared with 34.9% at Top Wealth.
Top Wealth scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for AsiaStrategy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SORA | TWG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.20 | $2.53 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.8% | −99.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.13 | – |
| Employees | 7 | 2 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −37.7% | 92.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 3.5% | 74.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −14.3% | – |
| Net margin | 112% (better) | 34.9% |
| FCF margin | −39.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 81.8% (better) | 13.8% |
| Return on invested capital | −47.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | 0.01 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −5.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 17.06 (better) | 10.66 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.14% | 3.1% |
| Held by insiders | 58.1% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.79% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- SORA stock overview
- SORA income statement
- SORA valuation and score
- TWG stock overview
- TWG income statement
- TWG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.