Smart Sand vs Energy Fuels
SND and UUUU side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SND and UUUU compare
Energy Fuels is the larger company, worth 9.1 times as much as Smart Sand ($1.7B against $190M).
Energy Fuels grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.9% versus 21.2% for Smart Sand).
Smart Sand keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.9% compared with −100.0% at Energy Fuels.
Smart Sand pays a dividend yielding 5.6%; Energy Fuels does not pay one.
Smart Sand scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 6 for Energy Fuels), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SND | UUUU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $190M | $1.7B |
| Share price | $4.49 | $6.93 |
| Change, 1 year | 102% | −58.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 130% | −24.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 318 | 1,069 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.8× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 14.8× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 5.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 19.5% | – |
| Fair value | $6.51 | $8.66 |
| Margin of safety | 31.0% (better) | 19.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.2% | 48.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.0% | 109% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 306% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 322% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −49.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 13.9% | 47.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.9% (better) | −81.0% |
| Net margin | 3.9% (better) | −100.0% |
| FCF margin | 9.1% | – |
| Return on equity | 6.6% (better) | −14.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% (better) | −10.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.05 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.31 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −10.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.81 | 20.49 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.74 (better) | 1.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 64.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.90% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 46.0% | 72.4% |
| Held by insiders | 34.4% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.6M | −$1.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | 23.6% |
Go deeper
- SND stock overview
- SND income statement
- SND valuation and score
- UUUU stock overview
- UUUU income statement
- UUUU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.