Simply Good Foods vs Vital Farms
SMPL and VITL side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SMPL and VITL compare
Simply Good Foods is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Vital Farms ($1.1B against $389M).
Vital Farms grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus −6.5% for Simply Good Foods).
Vital Farms keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.02% compared with −11.5% at Simply Good Foods.
Vital Farms scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Simply Good Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SMPL | VITL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $389M |
| Share price | $12.57 | $9.07 |
| Change, 1 year | −35.7% | −72.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −67.8% | −52.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 282 | 739 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 37.4× |
| P/FCF | 7.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 14.4% (better) | −32.4% |
| Fair value | $28.37 | $8.41 |
| Margin of safety | 55.7% (better) | −7.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.5% | 16.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.2% | 28.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −250% | −99.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −266% | −104% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 39.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.6% (better) | 28.1% |
| Operating margin | −13.2% | 0.04% (better) |
| Net margin | −11.5% | 0.02% (better) |
| FCF margin | 11.6% (better) | −16.5% |
| Return on equity | −9.6% | 0.05% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −7.8% | 0.07% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.24 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −8.4× | 0.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 5.57 (better) | 1.10 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.00 | 2.96 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 19.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 19.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.0% | 85.3% |
| Held by insiders | 10.0% | 39.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.1M (better) | −$3.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.7% | 36.9% |
Go deeper
- SMPL stock overview
- SMPL income statement
- SMPL valuation and score
- VITL stock overview
- VITL income statement
- VITL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.