SIFCO Industries vs TAT Technologies
SIF and TATT side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SIF and TATT compare
SIFCO Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.8% versus 12.1% for TAT Technologies).
TAT Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with 4.0% at SIFCO Industries.
SIFCO Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for TAT Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SIF | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $98.1M | – |
| Share price | $15.68 | $37.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 131% | −6.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 106% | 472% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 244 | 3,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.5× | – |
| P/S | 1.0× | – |
| P/B | 2.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 29.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | – |
| Fair value | $17.68 | – |
| Margin of safety | 11.3% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.8% (better) | 12.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −5.7% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 53.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 31.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.6% | 25.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | 10.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.0% | 11.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.4% | 3.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.3% | 11.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.1% | 11.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.29 | 0.06 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.26 (better) | −1.80 |
| Interest coverage | 3.8× | 27.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.77 | 4.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.65 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 28.2% | 58.4% |
| Held by insiders | 17.8% | 39.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$478K |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- SIF stock overview
- SIF income statement
- SIF valuation and score
- TATT stock overview
- TATT income statement
- TATT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.