Sherwin Williams vs ZKH
SHW and ZKH side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SHW and ZKH compare
Sherwin Williams grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.8% versus 2.6% for ZKH).
Sherwin Williams keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.0% compared with −1.6% at ZKH.
Sherwin Williams pays a dividend yielding 0.96%; ZKH does not pay one.
Sherwin Williams scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 4 for ZKH), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SHW | ZKH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $80.7B | – |
| Share price | $332.61 | $1.64 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.8% | −45.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.3% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.29 |
| Employees | 64K | 1,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.7× | – |
| P/S | 3.3× | – |
| P/B | 20.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 25.1× | – |
| PEG | 3.08 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.0% | – |
| Fair value | $233.43 | – |
| Margin of safety | −42.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.8% (better) | 2.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.0% (better) | 16.4% |
| Operating margin | – | −2.4% |
| Net margin | 11.0% (better) | −1.6% |
| FCF margin | 13.2% (better) | −0.49% |
| Return on equity | 65.1% (better) | −4.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −11.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.13 | 0.10 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −18.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.73 | 1.79 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.99 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | – |
| Payout ratio | 29.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.1% | 0.20% |
| Held by insiders | 0.32% | 8.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.7M | −$797K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.9% | – |
Go deeper
- SHW stock overview
- SHW income statement
- SHW valuation and score
- ZKH stock overview
- ZKH income statement
- ZKH valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.