StockData

Schmid vs Velo3D

SHMD and VELO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How SHMD and VELO compare

Velo3D grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.9% versus 10.0% for Schmid).

Velo3D keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −86.2% compared with −106% at Schmid.

Velo3D scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 1 for Schmid), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSHMDVELO
Size and price
Market cap–$133M
Share price$2.09$4.15
Change, 1 year−63.0%−28.1%
Change, 5 years–−99.9%
Beta (5Y)0.39−0.05
Employees73428
StockData Score
Total score18 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score01 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–2.1×
P/B–1.0×
FCF yield–−50.1%
Fair value–$9.04
Margin of safety–54.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)10.0%30.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–19.4%
Profitability
Gross margin23.9% (better)11.5%
Operating margin2.2% (better)−86.2%
Net margin−106%−86.2% (better)
FCF margin–−104%
Return on equity–−66.4%
Return on invested capital–−110%
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA8.29–
Interest coverage0.0× (better)−34.9×
Current ratio0.375.12 (better)
Altman Z-score–−2.17
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–37.9%
Held by insiders–47.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months$309K (better)$0
Short interest, % of float–35.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.