StockData

Shimmick vs Southland

SHIM and SLND side by side, both in heavy construction other than building construction contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How SHIM and SLND compare

Shimmick is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Southland ($93.8M against $34.2M).

Shimmick grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−16.0% versus −32.7% for Southland).

Shimmick keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.8% compared with −67.0% at Southland.

Shimmick scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for Southland), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSHIMSLND
Size and price
Market cap$93.8M$34.2M
Share price$2.27$0.629
Change, 1 year8.8%−86.0%
Change, 5 years–319%
Beta (5Y)1.730.29
Employees9711,800
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)2
Valuation score11
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2×0.1× (better)
EV/EBITDA41.0×–
FCF yield−57.4% (better)−460%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−16.0% (better)−32.7%
Profitability
Gross margin10.1% (better)−44.1%
Operating margin−1.9% (better)−54.6%
Net margin−3.8% (better)−67.0%
FCF margin−12.3% (better)−26.1%
Return on invested capital–−183%
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA15.24–
Interest coverage−1.0× (better)−9.6×
Current ratio1.001.27 (better)
Altman Z-score1.32 (better)−1.39
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions14.0%12.5%
Held by insiders72.2%76.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$358K$42.9K (better)
Short interest, % of float3.8%2.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.