Shenandoah Telecommunications vs Uniti
SHEN and UNIT side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SHEN and UNIT compare
Uniti is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Shenandoah Telecommunications ($1.2B against $563M).
Uniti grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (200% versus 5.0% for Shenandoah Telecommunications).
Uniti keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.4% compared with −10.4% at Shenandoah Telecommunications.
Shenandoah Telecommunications pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Uniti does not pay one.
Shenandoah Telecommunications scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Uniti), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SHEN | UNIT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $563M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $10.17 | $5.06 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.4% | −13.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −63.8% | −63.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 1.26 |
| Employees | 1,041 | 8,632 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 1.6× |
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 7.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.3× | 9.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | −40.4% | – |
| Fair value | $13.84 | – |
| Margin of safety | 26.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% | 200% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 2951% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 1208% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.9% | – |
| Operating margin | −5.3% | 3.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.4% | 30.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −61.9% | – |
| Return on equity | −4.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −1.1% | 1.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.83 (better) | 65.92 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.21 (better) | 8.25 |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | 0.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.85 | 1.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.94 (better) | 0.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −20.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 71.6% | 93.1% |
| Held by insiders | 24.7% | 30.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $74.3K (better) | −$58.6K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- SHEN stock overview
- SHEN income statement
- SHEN valuation and score
- UNIT stock overview
- UNIT income statement
- UNIT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.