Solaris Energy Infrastructure vs Team
SEI and TISI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SEI and TISI compare
Solaris Energy Infrastructure is the larger company, worth 54 times as much as Team ($5.0B against $91.3M).
Solaris Energy Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (73.8% versus 0.45% for Team).
Solaris Energy Infrastructure keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.0% compared with −3.7% at Team.
Solaris Energy Infrastructure pays a dividend yielding 0.74%; Team does not pay one.
Solaris Energy Infrastructure scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for Team), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SEI | TISI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.0B | $91.3M |
| Share price | $64.80 | $19.92 |
| Change, 1 year | 28.7% | 21.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 879% | 23.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 468 | 5,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 5.3× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.7× | 10.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | −21.4% | −6.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $31.65 | – |
| Margin of safety | −105% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 73.8% (better) | 0.45% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 43.3% (better) | 1.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 96.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 24.6% |
| Operating margin | 22.8% (better) | 0.56% |
| Net margin | 8.0% (better) | −3.7% |
| FCF margin | −114% | −0.67% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 10.5% (better) | 1.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.35 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.73 (better) | 7.94 |
| Interest coverage | 4.4× (better) | 0.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.10 | 2.20 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.36 (better) | 0.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | – |
| Payout ratio | 38.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.74% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.8% | 56.8% |
| Held by insiders | 34.1% | 54.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$299M | −$55.6M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 33.3% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- SEI stock overview
- SEI income statement
- SEI valuation and score
- TISI stock overview
- TISI income statement
- TISI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.