Vivid Seats vs StubHub
SEAT and STUB side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SEAT and STUB compare
StubHub is the larger company, worth 130 times as much as Vivid Seats ($2.0B against $15.6M).
StubHub grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.9% versus −23.4% for Vivid Seats).
StubHub scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Vivid Seats), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SEAT | STUB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.6M | $2.0B |
| Share price | $1.39 | $5.31 |
| Change, 1 year | −85.3% | −72.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | 1.49 |
| Employees | 565 | 900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | – | 1.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 3.2× |
| FCF yield | −451% | 31.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $57.43 | $10.26 |
| Margin of safety | 97.6% (better) | 48.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −23.4% | 7.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 80.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 82.1% |
| Operating margin | – | −69.7% |
| Net margin | – | −91.3% |
| FCF margin | −17.7% | 32.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −141% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −60.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.86 |
| Interest coverage | – | −14.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.47 | 1.04 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −3.05 | −0.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.02% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.02% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.3% | 74.5% |
| Held by insiders | – | 49.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.5K (better) | −$11.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- SEAT stock overview
- SEAT income statement
- SEAT valuation and score
- STUB stock overview
- STUB income statement
- STUB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.