Service Corp International vs UniFirst
SCI and UNF side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SCI and UNF compare
Service Corp International is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as UniFirst ($10.4B against $4.6B).
On earnings, Service Corp International is cheaper: it trades at 19.0× trailing earnings, against 40.2× for UniFirst.
Service Corp International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus 1.4% for UniFirst).
Service Corp International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.7% compared with 4.6% at UniFirst.
Both pay dividends: Service Corp International yields 1.8% and UniFirst 0.57%.
Service Corp International scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 13 for UniFirst), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SCI | UNF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.4B | $4.6B |
| Share price | $76.37 | $254.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.6% | 63.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.6% | 22.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 18K | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.0× (better) | 40.2× |
| P/S | 2.4× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 6.6× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.4× (better) | 15.5× |
| P/FCF | 15.3× (better) | 52.2× |
| PEG | 7.62 | 2.98 (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.5% (better) | 1.9% |
| Fair value | $66.83 | $157.93 |
| Margin of safety | −14.3% (better) | −61.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.0% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.2% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.0% (better) | −23.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 8.6% (better) | −22.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.7% (better) | 2.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.9% | 36.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 22.7% (better) | 5.8% |
| Net margin | 12.7% (better) | 4.6% |
| FCF margin | 15.4% (better) | 3.5% |
| Return on equity | 35.7% (better) | 5.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.7% (better) | 5.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.28 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.98 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.40 | 3.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.76 | 6.80 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.8% (better) | 0.57% |
| Payout ratio | 34.4% | 21.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.6% (better) | 1.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.5% (better) | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.8% | 81.3% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 54.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.3M | −$576K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 11.4% |
Go deeper
- SCI stock overview
- SCI income statement
- SCI valuation and score
- UNF stock overview
- UNF income statement
- UNF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.