StockData

SBC Medical vs Starling Oncology

SBC and STLN side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How SBC and STLN compare

Starling Oncology is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as SBC Medical ($666M against $543M).

Starling Oncology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.4% versus −6.9% for SBC Medical).

SBC Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.0% compared with −6.2% at Starling Oncology.

SBC Medical scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Starling Oncology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSBCSTLN
Size and price
Market cap$543M$666M
Share price$5.28$6.53
Change, 1 year56.1%38.9%
Change, 5 years–−34.6%
Beta (5Y)0.421.60
Employees863641
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)6
Valuation score4 (better)1
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E11.2×–
P/S3.1×1.1× (better)
P/B2.1×–
EV/EBITDA5.5×–
P/FCF8.8×–
FCF yield11.4% (better)−0.49%
Fair value$8.42–
Margin of safety37.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−6.9%38.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–21.8%
Net income growth (TTM)47.1%–
EPS growth (TTM)46.9%–
Profitability
Gross margin71.9%–
Operating margin37.3% (better)−4.4%
Net margin28.0% (better)−6.2%
FCF margin35.3% (better)−0.56%
Return on equity19.3%–
Return on invested capital50.7% (better)−83.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA−2.69–
Interest coverage195× (better)−3.4×
Current ratio3.31 (better)1.36
Altman Z-score4.97 (better)2.78
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions8.3%43.4%
Held by insiders82.0%56.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$20.1M−$122K (better)

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.