StockData

Sabre vs Sportradar

SABR and SRAD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How SABR and SRAD compare

Sportradar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.6% versus 4.7% for Sabre).

Sportradar scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Sabre), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSABRSRAD
Size and price
Market cap$654M–
Share price$1.62$12.03
Change, 1 year−15.2%−54.0%
Change, 5 years−83.7%−45.3%
Beta (5Y)1.911.44
Employees4,6505,090
StockData Score
Total score612 (better)
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score04 (better)
Performance score04 (better)
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E1.0×–
P/S0.2×–
EV/EBITDA10.0×–
FCF yield−2.5%–
Fair value$27.13–
Margin of safety94.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.7%16.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average15.7%26.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–194%
Profitability
Gross margin56.2%85.2% (better)
Operating margin11.3%–
Net margin–7.8%
FCF margin−0.57%30.9% (better)
Return on equity–10.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.06
Net debt / EBITDA8.43 (better)−1.11
Current ratio1.021.17 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.25–
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions98.7%16.6%
Held by insiders15.4%9.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months$24.7M (better)$11.3M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float8.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.