StockData

RxSight vs STAAR Surgical

RXST and STAA side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How RXST and STAA compare

STAAR Surgical is the larger company, worth 6.1 times as much as RxSight ($1.2B against $203M).

STAAR Surgical grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (51.3% versus −13.2% for RxSight).

STAAR Surgical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.1% compared with −36.8% at RxSight.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricRXSTSTAA
Size and price
Market cap$203M$1.2B
Share price$4.87$24.54
Change, 1 year−42.2%−7.7%
Change, 5 years−63.2%−78.8%
Beta (5Y)1.071.50
Employees461957
StockData Score
Total score1010
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score12 (better)
Health score46 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–351×
P/S1.6× (better)3.6×
P/B0.8× (better)3.4×
EV/EBITDA–76.4×
FCF yield−13.4%−0.55% (better)
Fair value$20.54$15.38
Margin of safety76.3% (better)−59.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−13.2%51.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average55.7% (better)7.9%
Profitability
Gross margin77.5% (better)76.6%
Operating margin−43.2%4.0% (better)
Net margin−36.8%1.1% (better)
FCF margin−21.3%−2.0% (better)
Return on equity−17.3%1.1% (better)
Return on invested capital−82.9%4.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage−3674.3×–
Current ratio4.074.66 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.697.82 (better)
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−0.99%–
Shareholder yield−0.99%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions99.6%110%
Held by insiders5.4%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$118K$62.8M (better)
Short interest, % of float10.4%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.