StockData

RxSight vs Sight Sciences

RXST and SGHT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How RXST and SGHT compare

Sight Sciences is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as RxSight ($597M against $221M).

Sight Sciences grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.2% versus −13.2% for RxSight).

Sight Sciences keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −32.1% compared with −36.8% at RxSight.

RxSight scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Sight Sciences), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricRXSTSGHT
Size and price
Market cap$221M$597M
Share price$5.32$10.83
Change, 1 year−46.9%40.3%
Change, 5 years−60.7%−46.3%
Beta (5Y)1.111.99
Employees461186
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score11
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.7× (better)6.7×
P/B0.8× (better)12.1×
FCF yield−12.3%−2.8% (better)
Fair value$20.64$4.01
Margin of safety74.2% (better)−170%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−13.2%16.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average55.7% (better)22.9%
Profitability
Gross margin77.5%87.7% (better)
Operating margin−43.2%−29.5% (better)
Net margin−36.8%−32.1% (better)
FCF margin−21.3%−19.1% (better)
Return on equity−17.3% (better)−50.1%
Return on invested capital−82.9% (better)−134%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.96 (better)
Interest coverage−3674.3×−5.1× (better)
Current ratio4.075.04 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.561.91 (better)
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−0.90%–
Shareholder yield−0.90%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions99.6%40.2%
Held by insiders5.4%33.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$118K (better)−$2.2M
Short interest, % of float9.2%3.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.