Rush Street Interactive vs StubHub
RSI and STUB side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RSI and STUB compare
Rush Street Interactive is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as StubHub ($2.8B against $2.2B).
Rush Street Interactive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.7% versus 7.9% for StubHub).
Rush Street Interactive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.6% compared with −91.3% at StubHub.
Rush Street Interactive scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for StubHub), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RSI | STUB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.8B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $12.12 | $5.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −33.3% | −70.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −38.7% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.59 | 1.94 |
| Employees | 912 | 900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.4× | – |
| P/S | 1.9× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 14.4× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 13.3× | 3.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.5% | 28.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $13.01 | $16.37 |
| Margin of safety | 6.8% | 64.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 38.7% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 32.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 20.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.5% | 82.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.9% (better) | −69.7% |
| Net margin | 2.6% (better) | −91.3% |
| FCF margin | 14.3% | 32.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 23.0% (better) | −141% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −60.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.86 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −14.5× |
| Current ratio | 2.22 (better) | 1.04 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.28 (better) | −0.90 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.48% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.48% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 54.4% | 74.5% |
| Held by insiders | 54.5% | 49.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$360M | −$11.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.6% | 16.3% |
Go deeper
- RSI stock overview
- RSI income statement
- RSI valuation and score
- STUB stock overview
- STUB income statement
- STUB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.