Red Robin Gourmet Burgers vs Wendy's
RRGB and WEN side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RRGB and WEN compare
Wendy's is the larger company, worth 8.0 times as much as Red Robin Gourmet Burgers ($1.4B against $172M).
Wendy's grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.98% versus −3.7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers).
Wendy's keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with −2.5% at Red Robin Gourmet Burgers.
Wendy's pays a dividend yielding 6.8%; Red Robin Gourmet Burgers does not pay one.
Wendy's scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 4 for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RRGB | WEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $172M | $1.4B |
| Share price | $9.11 | $7.21 |
| Change, 1 year | 69.3% | −16.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −59.5% | −68.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.05 | 0.65 |
| Employees | 19K | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 10.9× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | – | 11.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0× (better) | 8.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 5.2× |
| PEG | – | 9.07 |
| FCF yield | −1.0% | 19.2% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $17.08 |
| Margin of safety | – | 57.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.7% | −0.98% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.9% (better) | 4.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −34.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −31.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 63.0% |
| Operating margin | −0.37% | 13.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.5% | 5.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.15% | 12.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 108% |
| Return on invested capital | −8.0% | 8.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 22.82 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.14 (better) | 5.26 |
| Interest coverage | −0.2× | 2.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.71 | 1.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.80 (better) | 1.03 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 6.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 84.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 18.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 8.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.2% | 94.1% |
| Held by insiders | 34.4% | 17.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$68.0K | $17.8K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.4% | 30.9% |
Go deeper
- RRGB stock overview
- RRGB income statement
- RRGB valuation and score
- WEN stock overview
- WEN income statement
- WEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.