Rantizo vs Springview
RNTZ and SPHL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RNTZ and SPHL compare
Rantizo grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.6% versus −11.4% for Springview).
Rantizo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −22.6% compared with −30.1% at Springview.
Springview scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Rantizo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RNTZ | SPHL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $4.55 | $2.41 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.1% | −32.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.04 | −0.06 |
| Employees | 177 | 73 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.6% (better) | −11.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −864% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −900% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.1% (better) | 13.7% |
| Operating margin | −19.6% (better) | −31.8% |
| Net margin | −22.6% (better) | −30.1% |
| FCF margin | −43.6% | – |
| Return on equity | −40.2% | −38.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −36.9% (better) | −39.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.14 |
| Interest coverage | −5.3× (better) | −44.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.74 | 3.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 78.3% | 70.4% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.21% | – |
Go deeper
- RNTZ stock overview
- RNTZ income statement
- RNTZ valuation and score
- SPHL stock overview
- SPHL income statement
- SPHL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.