Rambus vs Synaptics
RMBS and SYNA side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RMBS and SYNA compare
Rambus is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Synaptics ($9.2B against $4.6B).
Rambus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.2% versus 11.4% for Synaptics).
Rambus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.7% compared with −41.0% at Synaptics.
Rambus scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for Synaptics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RMBS | SYNA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.2B | $4.6B |
| Share price | $84.65 | $117.86 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.0% | 68.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 253% | −52.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.72 | 2.00 |
| Employees | 791 | 1,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 38.8× | – |
| P/S | 12.1× | 3.8× (better) |
| P/B | 6.3× | 5.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 29.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 30.7× (better) | 45.5× |
| FCF yield | 3.3% (better) | 2.2% |
| Fair value | $79.26 | $98.41 |
| Margin of safety | −6.8% (better) | −19.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.2% (better) | 11.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.5% (better) | −2.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 3.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 79.5% (better) | 44.7% |
| Operating margin | 35.5% (better) | −5.6% |
| Net margin | 31.7% (better) | −41.0% |
| FCF margin | 39.6% (better) | 8.5% |
| Return on equity | 17.8% (better) | −42.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 34.3% (better) | −3.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.90 |
| Interest coverage | 225× | – |
| Current ratio | 9.75 (better) | 1.12 |
| Altman Z-score | 39.74 (better) | 3.34 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.05% | 2.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.05% | 2.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.8% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 0.77% | 3.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.5M | −$8.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- RMBS stock overview
- RMBS income statement
- RMBS valuation and score
- SYNA stock overview
- SYNA income statement
- SYNA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.