Rambus vs Silicon Motion Technology
RMBS and SIMO side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RMBS and SIMO compare
Rambus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.2% versus 10.2% for Silicon Motion Technology).
Rambus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.7% compared with 13.8% at Silicon Motion Technology.
Silicon Motion Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Rambus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RMBS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.2B | – |
| Share price | $84.65 | $208.65 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.0% | 107% |
| Change, 5 years | 253% | 195% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.72 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 791 | 2,009 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 38.8× | – |
| P/S | 12.1× | – |
| P/B | 6.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 29.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 30.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.3% | – |
| Fair value | $79.26 | – |
| Margin of safety | −6.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.2% (better) | 10.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.5% (better) | 10.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.6% | 37.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 3.3% | 37.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 79.5% (better) | 48.3% |
| Operating margin | 35.5% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net margin | 31.7% (better) | 13.8% |
| FCF margin | 39.6% (better) | 0.71% |
| Return on equity | 17.8% (better) | 15.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 34.3% (better) | 14.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 225× | – |
| Current ratio | 9.75 (better) | 2.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 39.74 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 54.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.4% |
| Buyback yield | 0.05% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.05% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.8% | 18.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.77% | 0.84% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.5M | −$1.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | – |
Go deeper
- RMBS stock overview
- RMBS income statement
- RMBS valuation and score
- SIMO stock overview
- SIMO income statement
- SIMO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.