Resolute Holdings Management vs Walker & Dunlop
RHLD and WD side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RHLD and WD compare
Resolute Holdings Management and Walker & Dunlop are about the same size, with market caps of $1.2B and $1.3B.
Resolute Holdings Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (239% versus 0.87% for Walker & Dunlop).
Resolute Holdings Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.8% compared with −2.6% at Walker & Dunlop.
Walker & Dunlop pays a dividend yielding 7.1%; Resolute Holdings Management does not pay one.
Walker & Dunlop scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Resolute Holdings Management), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RHLD | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $149.01 | $38.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.6% | −42.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −74.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.00 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 5,534 | 1,466 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.6× | – |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | – | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 26.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 10.0× | 0.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 10.0% | 117% (better) |
| Fair value | $136.25 | $79.95 |
| Margin of safety | −9.4% | 52.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 239% (better) | 0.87% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 2.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −128% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −130% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −26.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 12.2% | – |
| Net margin | 2.8% (better) | −2.6% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% | 123% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −1.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.22 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.41 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.63 | 0.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 8.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 54.0% | 86.7% |
| Held by insiders | – | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $112K | $990K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- RHLD stock overview
- RHLD income statement
- RHLD valuation and score
- WD stock overview
- WD income statement
- WD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.