Regis vs Xwell
RGS and XWEL side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RGS and XWEL compare
Regis is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Xwell ($74.1M against $5.9M).
Regis grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.8% versus −7.6% for Xwell).
Regis keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.1% compared with −82.9% at Xwell.
Xwell scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Regis), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RGS | XWEL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $74.1M | $5.9M |
| Share price | $29.67 | $0.690 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.4% | −28.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −46.3% | −97.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 1,611 | 280 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.3× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 0.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 6.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 15.0% (better) | −227% |
| Fair value | $53.04 | – |
| Margin of safety | 44.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% (better) | −7.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −11.4% | 28.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −94.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 34.3% |
| Operating margin | 10.9% (better) | −61.3% |
| Net margin | 3.1% (better) | −82.9% |
| FCF margin | 5.0% (better) | −47.6% |
| Return on equity | 3.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 8.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.60 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.22 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.62 | 2.27 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.89 (better) | −34.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.82% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.82% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 31.0% | 6.4% |
| Held by insiders | 10.3% | 42.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.0K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- RGS stock overview
- RGS income statement
- RGS valuation and score
- XWEL stock overview
- XWEL income statement
- XWEL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.