Resources Connection vs Rimini Street
RGP and RMNI side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RGP and RMNI compare
Rimini Street is the larger company, worth 5.5 times as much as Resources Connection ($513M against $92.7M).
Rimini Street grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.9% versus −19.6% for Resources Connection).
Rimini Street keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.5% compared with −10.7% at Resources Connection.
Resources Connection pays a dividend yielding 10.5%; Rimini Street does not pay one.
Resources Connection scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for Rimini Street), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RGP | RMNI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $92.7M | $513M |
| Share price | $2.67 | $5.53 |
| Change, 1 year | −41.1% | 36.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −85.0% | −19.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 3,006 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 46.1× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 0.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 22.9× |
| FCF yield | −11.4% | 4.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $7.68 | $2.92 |
| Margin of safety | 65.2% (better) | −89.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −19.6% | 2.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.4% | 5.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −74.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −73.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.0% | 60.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −10.1% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.7% | 2.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.5% | 5.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −25.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −30.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −1.72 |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.5× |
| Current ratio | 2.85 (better) | 0.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.39 (better) | 1.39 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 10.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −12.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 10.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.7% | 69.6% |
| Held by insiders | 27.5% | 16.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$4.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- RGP stock overview
- RGP income statement
- RGP valuation and score
- RMNI stock overview
- RMNI income statement
- RMNI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.