Ridgetech vs 111
RDGT and YI side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RDGT and YI compare
Ridgetech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.2% versus −12.8% for 111).
Ridgetech scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for 111), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RDGT | YI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.16 | $2.93 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.6% | −28.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | −94.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.44 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 64 | 144 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.2% (better) | −12.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.15% | 8.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −112% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −106% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 3.6% | 5.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | −0.02% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.95% | – |
| FCF margin | −1.1% | 0.91% (better) |
| Return on equity | −4.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −8.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −39.46 |
| Interest coverage | −27.8× | −0.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.31 (better) | 1.09 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.3% | 0.01% |
| Held by insiders | – | 21.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $45.6K (better) | −$369K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
Go deeper
- RDGT stock overview
- RDGT income statement
- RDGT valuation and score
- YI stock overview
- YI income statement
- YI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.