Recon Technology vs Mammoth Energy Services
RCON and TUSK side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RCON and TUSK compare
Recon Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (65.8% versus −54.8% for Mammoth Energy Services).
Mammoth Energy Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.1% compared with −27.0% at Recon Technology.
Mammoth Energy Services scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Recon Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RCON | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $157M |
| Share price | $0.875 | $3.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.7% | 63.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | 30.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 194 | 115 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.2× |
| P/S | – | 2.0× |
| P/B | – | 0.6× |
| FCF yield | – | −91.0% |
| Fair value | – | $5.95 |
| Margin of safety | – | 45.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 65.8% (better) | −54.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.0% (better) | −32.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.2% | – |
| Operating margin | −37.5% | −10.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −27.0% | 17.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −181% |
| Return on equity | −5.7% | 5.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −7.3% | −4.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −39.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.73 (better) | 1.50 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 0.34 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 54.2% |
| Held by insiders | 56.5% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $10.5M |
Go deeper
- RCON stock overview
- RCON income statement
- RCON valuation and score
- TUSK stock overview
- TUSK income statement
- TUSK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.