Recon Technology vs Ranger Energy Services
RCON and RNGR side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RCON and RNGR compare
Recon Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (65.8% versus 16.9% for Ranger Energy Services).
Ranger Energy Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with −27.0% at Recon Technology.
Ranger Energy Services pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Recon Technology does not pay one.
Ranger Energy Services scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 5 for Recon Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RCON | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $293M |
| Share price | $0.875 | $12.51 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.7% | −10.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | 22.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 0.39 |
| Employees | 194 | 2,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.2× |
| P/S | – | 0.5× |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 3.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 8.3× |
| FCF yield | – | 12.1% |
| Fair value | – | $18.38 |
| Margin of safety | – | 31.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 65.8% (better) | 16.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.0% | 23.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 4.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 0.00% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.2% (better) | 17.5% |
| Operating margin | −37.5% | 3.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −27.0% | 2.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 5.5% |
| Return on equity | −5.7% | 5.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −7.3% | 6.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.07 |
| Interest coverage | −39.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.73 (better) | 2.04 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.25 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 37.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.7% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 4.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 86.0% |
| Held by insiders | 56.5% | 7.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- RCON stock overview
- RCON income statement
- RCON valuation and score
- RNGR stock overview
- RNGR income statement
- RNGR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.